I have just completed a comprehensive report which presents the results from a sustainable packaging challenges and strategies survey, drawing from 221 responses across 96 companies. These companies range in revenue size from under $1 million to over $1 billion, with an average revenue per respondent of $4.65 billion. The survey primarily targeted packaging professionals, the majority of whom have managerial responsibilities and budgetary oversight. The core objective of this survey was to discern the primary challenges in sustainability and to ascertain if responses varied based on company revenue or type. The three pivotal questions in the survey aimed to:
Question 1:
The first key question sought to determine the preferred strategy among recycling, reduction, and compostable solutions. The data from this question would provide insights into the current trends in sustainable packaging and the direction companies might be taking in the near future.
Question 2:
The second question aimed to uncover the most significant challenge companies face regarding sustainability. Given the variety in revenue size and geographic location of the respondents, this question is vital to understand the overarching barriers in the industry and identify potential solutions.
Question 3:
The third question was designed to gather information about the packaging mix of the companies. This data can highlight industry standards and practices, revealing if certain packaging materials or methods are more prevalent based on company size or type.
Some highlights of what was found include:
The survey results underscore the industry's inclination towards recycling as both a preferred strategy and a significant challenge. This dual perception points to the potential gaps in recycling infrastructure, technology, or consumer behavior that might be hindering its full-scale adoption.
Materials availability, especially sustainable options, emerges as a pressing concern, particularly for medium to large companies. The challenges of scaling sustainable materials hint at a growing divergence between sustainability aspirations and the current manufacturing infrastructure.
The dominance of plastic in the packaging mix highlights its pivotal role in the sustainability discourse. As the most widely used material, it represents both the primary challenge and the most significant opportunity for achieving sustainable packaging goals.
Differences by Organization Type (Manufacturers vs. Consumer Goods):
Recycling is the most favored strategy across both consumer goods and manufacturers.
Consumer goods companies prefer the combination of recycling and reduction, followed by all three strategies, and then recycling alone.
Manufacturers prioritize recycling first, followed by the combination of recycling and reduction, and then the amalgamation of all three strategies.
Differences by Revenue Size:
Companies of all revenue sizes identify "Recycling" and "Materials" as paramount challenges.
The challenges of recycling, often seen as a promising strategy, become more pronounced as companies, especially those with significant revenues, delve deeper into its adoption.
Medium to large companies express concerns about the "Availability" of sustainable materials or technologies. Suppliers face difficulties in providing capacity for substantial product lines, and scalable superior technology is rare.
Overall, one of the main discoveries was nuanced differences in sustainability perspectives based on organization type and revenue size. While recycling stands out as a universally favored strategy, its challenges are magnified in the eyes of larger revenue companies. The dichotomy between consumer goods companies and manufacturers in strategy preference underscores the unique challenges each faces in the sustainability journey. Manufacturers, in particular, grapple with real-world challenges related to material testing and machinery compatibility, underscoring the need for materials that not only serve sustainability goals but also seamlessly integrate into existing manufacturing processes.
The concerns of medium to large companies about material availability spotlight a critical industry challenge: bridging the gap between sustainable aspirations and the current supply landscape. This is especially pertinent when considering the switch to alternative materials and the potential production risks involved. As the packaging industry evolves, understanding these nuanced differences is pivotal in crafting strategies that cater to the unique needs and challenges of different sectors and company sizes.
For further information please use the following link
I was most impressed by the sheer number of differences in responses across revenue and organization. Had expected a lot more alignment between supplier and brand but perhaps the biggest takeaway is how big a gap exists.
Comments